-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

* On 21-01-02 at 18:07 
* Derek D. Martin said....

> If you're not following the thread, but you suddenly decide it's
> important, GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD!  You've already received the
> e-mails, so you should have them.  If you don't, there's always the
> archives.  (mutt-users has archives, doesn't it?)  
> 
> > Is that where the hostile tone is coming from?
> 
> Not hostile.  Matter-of-fact, yes.  Occasionally emphatic, yes.  But
> never hostile.


Disagree, all this GO BACK AND READ THE THREAD! nonsense is insulting.
Of course I've been reading the thread. 

> 
> > 
> > > (assuming you've been following the thread at all), no more and no
> > 
> > Come on............. :)
> 
> Come on where?  My point is perfectly valid.  You've either read the
> thread or you haven't...  If not, then why jump into the middle of it,
> without reading it?  Ok, ok, I admit I do this occasionally too.
> But if you don't have enough context in a message from a thread, then
> you really ought to (re)read the thread to see what it's about, rather
> than expecting everyone else to waste bandwidth.

I'm not expecting anyone to do anything. I have read the thread. I don't
like your rudeness and I'm taking my ball back.


- -- 

Nick Wilson

Tel:    +45 3325 0688
Fax:    +45 3325 0677
Web:    www.explodingnet.com



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE8TE2lHpvrrTa6L5oRAi2sAJ0YdcJEDS7kq4JZvVNXU05L8n+pjwCfRhq9
s46/nuR+Icrag1t+hXnev2c=
=AUF8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to