Shawn McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The same reasons for doing so in private mail apply to lists. > The same reasons for not doing so in lists apply to private mail.
Yes, I know. At least this proves, that I managed to upset people with my child walk of PGP signatures (I agree, I should've selected more appropriate place for testing it for the first time); or would I get a "lecture" (saying it with no offense) from just joking, otherwise? My apologies, if I misinterpret your mood. > What you do or don't do is your choice, but it's silly to bother > turning on the capability at all if you aren't going to use it. Well, I didn't say I'm not going to use it. I will, that's for sure. It's just that I'm still introducing myself to the whole concept of PGP, how to apply it and so on. That's why it's under questioning for what I use it and for what I won't; I have a great deal of material to read through and form opinion(s) about them. Only then I can make decisions, that probably mean something. And to point it out once more; this mail wasn't written to offense you or upset you more, no. I just wanted to make my point (somewhat) clear, as well. As you know and as I mentioned, PGP is a new thing for me, so it would be foolish to start pretending that I already knew everything about it, as this is not the case. Man oh man, how my original question grew a thread of a larger measure - it wasn't my purpose, either. -- Jussi Ekholm | A Elbereth Gilthoniel, silivren penna m�riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] | o menel aglar elenath! Na-chaered palan-d�riel ekh @ IRCNet | o galadhremmin ennorath, Fanuilos le linnathon http://ekhowl.goa-head.org | nef aear, s� nef aearon
