--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alas! Jussi Ekholm spake thus:
> LOL Rob (I presume?)!=20

Yeah that was me ;)

> Well yeah, I really am on the verge of should I or should I not.

Next time, the spoof might not be so obvious :)

> Well, I'll leave that to the higher powers. At least so far I've
> signed the mails I've replied which were signed in the beginning.=20

That's good, for starters.

Typically, I will sign every message, so long as it is being sent to a
person/people who have the facilities to read the signature -- no point
signing something if the person on the other end has no way of
validating it and just sees it as garbage data.

> Oh, and thank you for your kind demonstration... ;-)

You're welcome :)

--=20
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Consider the following axioms carefully:
        "Everything's better when it sits on a Ritz."
        and
        "Everything's better with Blue Bonnet on it."
What happens if one spreads Blue Bonnet margarine on a Ritz cracker?  The
thought is frightening.  Is this how God came into being?  Try not to
consider the fact that "Things go better with Coke".

--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8nmqVPTh2iSBKeccRAov6AJ9VGXyzxUJjnpuHUQI6ec7TFxzA5ACffgj6
St5MDLQm44nOF3VbrHqzDzE=
=7/kW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--

Reply via email to