Hi, On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 03:14:14:PM -0500 Shawn McMahon wrote: > begin quoting what Rocco Rutte said on Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 07:58:17PM +0100: > > > > > At the very least, it doesn't read RFC1521-compliant mails as > > > recommended in the standard. > > > > Which has status informational only.
> Ok, first, wrong, it's standards-track, not informational. ACK. Looked up '1524' which is informational. My mistake. Strange, the topic of 1524 somehow would fit into the discussion (allthough it is not as important as 1521), so I didn't think about it. Just wondering why 1524 is so important to you... > However, it *IS* the MIME standard, and they claim their emailer is > a MIME emailer, so they can't get out of violating a standard by > saying "we support it" and then "it's not a standard" when it's > inconvenient. > "MIME-compliant" means "RFC1521-compliant", period. ACK Rocco
msg26120/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
