Volker -- ...and then Volker Kuhlmann said... % % On Thu 04 Apr 2002 09:10:35 NZST +1200, David T-G wrote: % % > % I have multiple mailbox folders. I want to save a copy of outgoing % > % message in the current mbox folder. Pretty reasonable enough. % > % > Interesting. % % I have the same problem. I want fcc set to the mbox folder where the % list email is in to which I am replying.
Well, now you know one way to do it :-) % % > % folder-hook . set record="" % > % folder-hook =local set record="=local" % > % folder-hook =haviworks set record="=haviworks" % > % folder-hook =ebase set record="=ebase" % > % > Sure, but that seems a pain. % % It's a big PITA for dozens of folders, created by procmail. I would have No, I was being sympathetic. I wouldn't do it that way. % thought for procmail tobe in very common use with people who use mutt. % It requires a folder-hook for each list - blerrg. Well, that's not so bad; after all, mutt can parse them for you and you never have to know. I'd just source a script that scans all of my incoming folders (especially since they're named to be easy to recognize) and let it do the work. % % One could use an fcc-save-hook for each list, which is a pain, and % the patterns become humangous fast. Not a problem. % % This doesn't work: % % folder-hook . set record="~/Mail/logfile" % folder-hook ".*-List" set record=!! Right. % % > Yep. But something like % > % > folder-hook . "my_hdr fcc: ^" % > % > might work well if you go ahead and include % > % > patch-1.3.23.bj.current_shortcut.1 % % I take it that the outgoing email doesn't actually get a fcc: header, Right; mutt interprets that itself. % but that this sets $record instead. I also take it that this can be Well, I don't know if it sets $record or not; I haven't looked in the code. One way to check would be to do that and then, from the compose menu, check the value of $record; I expect it would still be whatever it usually is. That's not an entirely incorrect way to look at it, though; I think you get the point. % reversed by a following fcc-save-hook (for non-mailing-list emails). Hmmm... Haven't tried that one; you'd have to give it a shot. You would probably have to unmy_hdr the fcc: instead. % % This patch is essential to mutt, please include it in the next version! Don't ask me; but the folks on mutt-dev or file an RFE with flea :-) % % Volker HTH & HAND % % -- % Volker Kuhlmann, list0570 at paradise dot net dot nz % http://volker.orcon.net.nz/ :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg26647/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
