On Thu 04-Apr-2002 at 02:34:50PM -0700, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote: > > it is now my understanding that there are 3 ways to sign a message: > pgp/mime, ascii armor, and application/pgp. i'm not certain on the > terminology for the last two or even that there is a difference > between them. might someone enlighten me?
Your understanding is pretty much correct, and Will has given you the mutt solution for communicating via ascii-pgp with Outlook (this involves a patch). For sending signed/encrypted messages to Outlook you might want to also look at the alternative s/mime system (also a mutt patch) or you can ascii pgp encrypt/sign the body of your mail in your editor (ie. outside of mutt altogether). -- Bruno
