Peter -- ...and then Peter T. Abplanalp said... % % On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:37:33AM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote: % > There's a better way, but more on that after we get your problem fixed. % > Could you answer "yes" on a response to the list, so we can see what % > you're sending out? % % not sure what you mean here. do you want me to send a simple email % from outlook or mutt? if mutt, does this suffice? or do you mean an % inline sig from mutt? or...?
He means that he would like for you to send a message in $p_c_t format to the list for our review. He might even mean that you should send another with an attachment (hey, why not `mutt -v` and make it useful? :-) and attempt to turn $p_c_t on for that one as well. % % > Also, are you getting any errors when you start Mutt? % % nope. mutt appears to be a happy camper. Of course. Fortunately, mutts are forgiving even when their owners are unkind to them, like making them talk outhouse ;-) % % -- % Peter Abplanalp % % Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] % PGP: pgp.mit.edu :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg26761/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
