dgc -- ...and then David Champion said... % % * On 2002.04.06, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, % * "Rob 'Feztaa' Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: % > Alas! David T-G spake thus: ... % > > % Use perl or python or egrep of emacs or some of the more modern vi ... % > > recall that egrep is *not* the same as mutt. % % But can we assume that perl is the same? I don't believe that we can.
I don't know about that one; my recollection is that perl worked well enough, but it wasn't my test at the time. BTW, it seems that [^(lauratg)] does not work; group-replies to said family broadcast messages suddenly come from this David T-G guy that mutt doesn't recognize :-) % That's the essence of the question; unfortunately it needs someone who's % been paying attention to code evolution (or a C reader with way too much % free time) to answer it. Ouch. % % Hmm -- or a quick hack that uses perl's regex.c. I'll get on that. Why not a quick hack that uses mutt's, or whatever regex library mutt is using? I don't get the perl source bit... % % -- % -D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] NSIT University of Chicago TIAagain & HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg26912/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
