Morning. I just wanted to ask this, because it's been on my mind for quite a bit of time already. So, as Mutt's manual say, "the old-style PGP message format is _strongly deprecated_". I shouldn't use it, then? But is the "new-style" PGP message format somehow unreadable for some mail clients, like Outlook?
I also have this in my ~/.muttrc (they're from Rolan Rosenfield): |# Once you are done with composing a mail in vim, and |# before you press y to send out an email, just press |# S and enter your PGP passphrase to pgp-clearsign an |# email. Mutt uses PGP-MIME signatures by default, and |# several clients (most notably windows clients) absolutely |# hate the very idea of PGP-MIME :( |# Put your gpg key id below instead of my key 0xEDEDEFB9 | macro compose S "Fgpg -a --clearsign -u 0x1410081E" Should I use this? I've noticed, that it has some things, that I'm not so fond of - for example, it messes up the signature delimiter completely. Or should I just sign all of my mails with "new-style" PGP message format? I haven't studied how differently Mutt handles PGP messages in 1.5.1.CVS than in stable releases, but still... Any input? :-) -- Jussi Ekholm -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://erppimaa.ihku.org/
msg30081/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
