On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:15:48 +0100 > > From: Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software) > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote: > > > Anyway, just out of curiosity, how come you guys aren't using TMDA? > > > Just haven't found it yet, or...? > > > > Probably because it's useless for quite a number of people. > > > > Much of my incoming mail is in response to enquiries I send out to > > trade suppliers and small businesses. If I implemented TMDA they > > would have to jump through hoops to get their response to me, it's > > difficult enough getting a response from some people anyway so I > > suspect that TMDA would reduce the reply rate to negligable > > proportions. The alternative of modifying the TDMA 'whitelist' when I > > send the enquiry out is similarly flawed (I have to jump through > > hoops) and anyway isn't guaranteed to work as they may not respond > > from an address I know about. > > I think you should re-read the tmda docs, especially the client > configuration. > Yes? This assumes that I own a domain and have an unlimited number of E-Mail addresses available to me, again not the normal situation.
-- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
