* Benjamin Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-29-07 06:05]: > Okay, as a workaround this should work for me, too. Thanks. But I don't > want my mails regarded as possible spam for the to-field isn't correct.
Please explain "to-field isn't correct" and site rfc's supporting your "supposition". > Maybe someone shows up with a clean solution. You have been offered several. Perhaps you should do some investigation to educate yourself rather than placing the onus on "someone". The provided mutt documentation is *very* good. ps: full quoting, especially sigs, is ungregarious. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org
