On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:19:28PM +0200, Michael Williams wrote:
On 23 Sep 2010, at 19:17, Christian Brabandt wrote:
4< * 3700 FETCH (UID 17146 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "23-Sep-2010 09:14:57
+0100" RFC822.SIZE 2612 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM SUBJECT TO CC MESSAGE-ID
REFERENCES CONTENT-TYPE CONTENT-DESCRIPTION IN-REPLY-TO REPLY-TO LINES LIST-POST X-LABEL)]
{404}
4< * 3702 FETCH (UID 17148 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE "23-Sep-2010 14:35:54
+0100" RFC822.SIZE 20548 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM SUBJECT TO CC MESSAGE-ID
REFERENCES CONTENT-TYPE CONTENT-DESCRIPTION IN-REPLY-TO REPLY-TO LINES LIST-POST X-LABEL)]
{408}
Here is one missing.
Is this the problem? Is there a workaround or is the conclusion that mutt is
not compatible with Exchange 2010 IMAP's support (or Exchange 2010 is not
compatible with mutt)?
Yes, this is the problem. Mutt expects to see a FETCH response for each
message the server says EXISTS. The IMAP standard requires that no "holes"
exist in the message sequence numbers, and mutt is not prepared to handle
them.
me
