* Tim Guirgies <[email protected]> [2011-06-06 19:38:02 +1000]:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:22:11PM +1000, Tim Guirgies wrote: > > I was going to talk about vim too, but probably best if I reply in the > > other thread. > > Interestingly enough, I'm unable to find that other thread, so I'll say > it here: type ":set formatoptions" in vim. You should see something > like "formatoptions=tcq". If "t" is not there, vim won't wrap even if > you set the textwidth. > > See this site [1] for more info. > [1] http://blog.ezyang.com/2010/03/vim-textwidth/ n vim (while editoring this email), I see the following formatoptions=tcqlw While in straight vim, I see formatoptions=tcq, So I don't get why vim won't break lines at 72, I'm still breaking them manually. P.S. Incidentally, is my mail being sent twice? I am still references the web interface and I see my mail to the list twice there... -- > A: Yes. > >Q: Are you sure? > >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
binjLuTPYY6LK.bin
Description: PGP Key 0xD5B20C0C.
