On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:16:24PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
> I tried my best to not give a clueless advice this
> time, so before suggesting to omit the user@ part
> from smtp_url I studied the mutt-1.5.20/smtp.c
> source:
> if (conn->account.flags & M_ACCT_USER)
> {
> if (!mutt_bit_isset (Capabilities, AUTH))
> {
> mutt_error (_("SMTP server does not support authentication"));
> mutt_sleep (1);
> return -1;
> }
>
> #ifdef USE_SASL
> if (!(conn->account.flags & M_ACCT_PASS) && option (OPTNOCURSES))
> {
> mutt_error (_("Interactive SMTP authentication not supported"));
> mutt_sleep (1);
> return -1;
> }
> return smtp_auth (conn);
> #else
> mutt_error (_("SMTP authentication requires SASL"));
> mutt_sleep (1);
> return -1;
> #endif /* USE_SASL */
> }
>
> I concluded that mutt omits SMTP authentication if
> and only if M_ACCT_USER is missing from
> account.flags (user@ part missing from smtp_url).
>
> --
> With best regards,
> xrgtn
Service above and beyond the call of duty!
I hope you didn't spend too much time on it.
I don't know if you were the one who mentioned msmtp--thanks to
whomever, though. I'll be staying with it.
--
Dave Williams
[email protected]
