On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:39:21PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d?a Wednesday, July 25, 2012 a las 09:44:47AM -0400, Mark E. Mallett > escribi?: > > > > Are you putting in a Mime-Version header field, or is that getting > > stripped too? (I don't see it in the example you appended) > > No, should we?
Yeah, if you are using any MIME header fields you should have the MIME-Version field too (see RFC2045). > I inserted now in addition: > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > In this case the mail arrives fine and the header gets re-written as: > > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Note: the utf-8 is now in small letters and the line splitted into two; > i.e. the MTA rewrote the Content-Type header line; Perhaps that means that that MTA is internalizing the header fields on input and regenerating them on output. Or maybe something else, it's hard to know. Is that the same MTA that deleted the content-type header too? > Does this mean that we must use in addition "MIME-Version: 1.0" header? I think so. Especially if that makes it work for you :) mm
