El día Wednesday, July 25, 2012 a las 12:49:31PM -0400, Mark E. Mallett
escribió:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:39:21PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > El d�a Wednesday, July 25, 2012 a las 09:44:47AM -0400, Mark E. Mallett
> > escribi�:
> > >
> > > Are you putting in a Mime-Version header field, or is that getting
> > > stripped too? (I don't see it in the example you appended)
> >
> > No, should we?
>
> Yeah, if you are using any MIME header fields you should have the
> MIME-Version field too (see RFC2045).
We have not set any MIME header fields, only Content-type;
I checked the source of the resulting mail and se now that UTF-8 coded
chars are represented like this, an "�" is arriving as "=C3=BC"; this is
not what we wanted, even if the MUA can show them fine; but what about other
software reading such mails? I'd prefer plain UTF-8 body.
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz
e <[email protected]> - w http://www.unixarea.de/
UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370)
UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5
