On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 03:14:08PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2014-01-08, Kim Christensen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > compared to postfix, sendmail, EXIM, qmail and the like.
> >
> > Noones arguing against using [me]smtp as the "real MTA" in this
> > scenario :-)
> 
> I think msmtp is great, and I've been using it for years.  But it
> implements such a small subset of what an MTA traditionally does that
> calling it a "real" MTA is a bit much.

Fair enough, I stand corrected! 

My intent was to prove that his suggestion actually fulfilled the role
of an MTA in the scenario discussed, but I agree calling them real
MTAs is a bit of a stretch... :-P

-- kchr

|_|O|_|  
|_|_|O|  Kim Christensen 
|O|O|O|  http://technopragmatics.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
() ascii ribbon campain - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to