* On 26 May 2015, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I started composing, rather than when I sent it. But you're right about > the rest. Oops! Back to the drawing board :-(
I do think a send-hook will help. I'll leave specifics to you. :) > > Also, I'm not offended, but what's lame about the built-in message-id > > generation? Does it need to be patched? > > What happens if multiple users send a message at the same moment, and it > is the same numbered message for each of them? Unlikely for human users > perhaps, but more imaginable as a byproduct of automation. The algorithm protects against repetition up to 26 messages per second by a single mutt process. Two separate processes will generate different IDs, unless you're recycling process ids more than once per second. So... I wouldn't be opposed to a new algo with a real hash, but I think collisions are already pretty unlikely. -- David Champion • [email protected]
