On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 08:57:50AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > I always thought $followup_to was a pretty nice feature. While I > sympathize with Matthias, the mischief was the result of > misconfiguration, and Mutt requires nothing if not attention to the > documentation and configuration. > > However, if there is a strong majority of mutt-users subscribers that > agree with $followup_to defaulting to 'no', I'll make the change.
I think it's a nice idea too, but the draft (which expired 20 years ago) never became a standard. I'd argue that if one of Mutt's claims to fame is standards-compliance, dropping support for it or not defaulting it to on might be the better option. w