On Thu 31 Oct 2019 09:24,
martin f krafft <madd...@madduck.net> put forth the proposition:
> Regarding the following, written by "Dave Woodfall" on 2019-10-30 at 11:25 
> Uhr +0000:
> > When messages turn up with no plain text part to them at all, or one
> > that's completely useless, it's wrong.
> I'd guess we all agree on that point.
> We're currently discussing the creation of multipart/alternative
> containers, which place the HTML part as an alternative to the plain-text
> part, so you can freely choose which one to read. Nobody is suggesting
> mutt no longer sends text/plain by default.

I know.  I was just thinking about some of the problems that seem to
occur at times in connection with receiving HTML messages these days.
I got a bit sidetracked.


Reply via email to