On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:59:43AM +0200, Jens John wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 09:46:48PM -0500, David Engel wrote: > > IT guy refuses to install any Outlook plugin for them to properly > > handle encypted emails. > > Outlook has pretty comprehensive, native support for encrypting and > signing with S/MIME. Perhaps your IT guy would be more open to just > using a well-documented Outlook feature? As mutt has support for S/MIME > too, this might be much more workable than insisting on PGP.
I've suggested that before. A few of us even had to use S/MIME for a while when a customer required us to. Basically, it boils down to inertia. PGP already works (for their definition of works) so why change. David -- David Engel [email protected]
