On 2008-12-12 15:54, Ted Pavlic wrote: > It would be nice to have something like... > > grm: Mark (toggle?) message read > grt: Mark (toggle?) thread read
View the source code for "l" -> lr -> label read. Use t to select a thread, and then lr, so tlr is label the whole thread read (actually toggles the state). > and similar gum and gut. That is, "message" and "thread" could be like > movements. ( I suppose a less-Vimmy alternative would be "tr" for > "thread read". ) Also consider something like... > > grat: Mark all messages read from this point forward in thread? > graT: Mark all messages read from this point backward in thread? > > My main point is that I think threads should be handled better in future > versions of Muttator, and I think a good START to that would be to > thinking about "movements" in terms of "message" and "thread." I thought about threads too, but i didn't find a compelling reason, where movements would make sense. I don't think one uses movements often enough, to change 'lr' to llr for the current message, just to allow ljr or something to label the current and next message as read. -- Martin _______________________________________________ Muttator mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/muttator
