Why America didn't had Peace talks with Taliban . And why America ask India to
go for peace talk when ever there was a tragedy happens...
Is Only Americans are human beings and only they have feelings ?
For last 63 year after Independence we are getting beatings but the Indian
government says Peace... Which becoming the strenght for the terrorist.
Did we announce war against any of the country after Independence ..the Answer
is No.
Pak will do what ever they wanted to do and they will announce war as if that
India committed something wrong.
Ashamed of Indian Politics.
Post 9/11: Pakistan wanted US to talk to Taliban
2010-09-14 09:40:00
Last Updated: 2010-09-14 09:47:01
Washington: As the US prepared to invade Afghanistan in 2001 after 9/11
attacks,
Pakistan's powerful ISI wanted America to enter into a dialogue with the
Taliban, but the then Bush Administration "bluntly" told President Pervez
Musharraf that it had no inclination to do so.
According to classified documents released by the National Security Archive of
the George Washington University, two days after Al-Qaeda unleashed terror on
the US, its envoy to Pakistan Wendy Chamberlin "bluntly" told Musharraf on
September 13, 2001 that there was "absolutely no inclination in Washington to
enter into a dialogue with the Taliban, which controlled Afghanistan at that
time.
Fellow Americans' suspicions frustrate US Muslims
"The time for dialogue was finished as of September 11," he told Musharraf, the
documents said. However, Pakistan, as the Taliban's primary sponsor, disagreed.
The documents also say Musharraf, who was facing the US heat because of his
support to the Taliban regime, accepted "unconditionally" in 24 hours all seven
demands made by the US like stopping at the Al-Qaeda at the border, provide the
US with blanket landing rights to conduct operations and territorial and naval
access and help in "destroying Osama Bin Laden".
However, events thereafter, showed that such an acceptance was just a "tactical
move" by Musharraf for all practical purposes there was not much change in the
polices of his government, the documents say.
The then ISI chief Mahmoud Ahmad also told the then US Ambassador to Pakistan
Wendy Chamberlin "not to act in anger."
"Real victory will come in negotiations...If the Taliban are
eliminated...Afghanistan will revert to warlordism," the documents quoted Ahmad
as saying.
Unsettled nation marks 9/11 with rituals of sorrow
The then ISI chief wanted the US to give Pakistan some time as he was headed
for
another trip to Afghanistan on September 25, 2001 to meet the top Taliban
leadership in this regard, said the classified cable dated September 23, 2001.
ISI chief Ahmad returned to Afghanistan to make a last-minute plea to the
Taliban.
General Ahmad told Wendy Chamberlin "his mission was taking place in parallel
with US Pakistani military planning" and that in his estimation, "a negotiated
solution would be preferable to military action."
"I implore you," Ahmad told the Ambassador, "not to act in anger. Real victory
will come in negotiations..."
"Taliban leader Mullah Omar himself," he said, "is frightened. That much was
clear in his last meeting."
The ISI chief told the Ambassador that America's strategic objectives of
getting
Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda would best be accomplished by coercing the Taliban
to do it themselves.
Ur's
M.K.
"making impossible possible"
--
___________________________________________________________________
Welcome to Maa Vee Maa Kaa Nanbargal valai Kuzhu (Friendship Group)!
This group is purely of the Youth,
by the Youth and
for the Youth.
Utilize this group to post your views & messages.
___________________________________________________________________
To post to this Maa Vee Maa Kaa group, send your emails to [email protected]
Regards,
Owner,
Maa Vee Maa Kaa.
