[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Here's the results of the throughput tests: >> Dongle 20061129 >> 2048: 5.2mbps >> 4096: 9.78mbps >> >> Dongle 0.3.2 >> 1024: 4.21mbps >> 2048: 6.56mbps >> 4096: 3.54mbps >> >> The demux info bars only show very small amounts of blue >> except for the 20061129/4096 test where the top one steadily
> Your numbers are certainly lower than what I see, by several mbps in > most cases. What does your network look like? Just a side note for a CIF file server. It seems that there it doesn't have such a big influence which kernel is used. I didn't mess with the buffer sizes (using the rsize=34000 as suggested for Win). So just for Info, here are my results (PC connected full duplex to 100MB Switch, followed by another 100MB full duplex switch to the MVP): 20061112: 10.75mb/s 20061129: 9.22mb/s 0.3.2: 10.86mb/s 20070107: 8.00mb/s Measured always with the same file, duration 20sec. The demux bar (video) always fill up quite nicely, around +80% steady. Done the measurements at lease twice each. Funny the 20070107 us slower. But I noticed a file size jump from 2.8MB 20061220 to 3.1MB for 20061222. Could that be some big change having an impact here? Oliver ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Mvpmc-users mailing list Mvpmc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mvpmc-users mvpmc wiki: http://mvpmc.wikispaces.com/
