I generally like the Computed-Score Priority but I've got one issue with it that I wonder if anyone has solved, or if a change would be required in the software.
The problem I have relates to how dates are handled. Specifically Start Dates. Say I have two tasks both ending tommorow. Task A has a start date set a month ago. Task B has a start date set a week ago. I understand why Task A will appear higher on the priority list, because I've had a whole month to do Task A and it's still not complete. However I just don't work that way in practical terms. I only want to use a start date to hide a task that can't start until say next week. I don't want the start date to change the weight of the two tasks I'll use importance and urgency for that. I've tried dropping the Start Date in the Weight factors but this has made little difference. A second issue is tasks with no start date, these generally end up way below tasks that do have a start date. Again I don't want the start date to have any say at all in the ordering, because the only reason one of the tasks had a start date to begin with is because it could not start until some time in the future. Any ideas how to solve this one? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/myLifeOrganized?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
