Sorry but I also disagree. If MLO becomes an online tool, I'll never use it. I need something that's instantly responsive (like MLO), that doesn't require me being online (I spend lot of time on planes for example), and that is never affected by network issues, etc. I'm not against some sort of "online" MLO version which would allow me to access my MLO files from any web client, but only as something additional, and never to replace my super-fast and fully-independent MLO desktop version. IMHO this would be much lower priority than iPhone or BB versions... or even lower priority than improving the WM phone (which I use) version of MLO to make it more and more similar to the desktop version. My two cents!
On Aug 11, 3:45 am, Ted Penner <[email protected]> wrote: > I have cheap developer outsourcers that I can turn over for selection. I > agree with Osaga, online is clearly the way to roll when it comes to cross > compatibility. The money you could make on that has is much greater. > > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 8:34 PM, osaga <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Andrey > > > If MLO were an online application you would probably make 10 times > > more money than you are now. If I had the money I would pay you to > > develop this application for online use. > > > It clearly beats any other task programs out there and being mobile > > and online would make it impossible for people to pirate. > > > How much would you charge to reprogram this for the web? > > > thanks, Osaga- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
