No filters were applied. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Timothee > Sent: 04 September 2009 7:06 a > To: MyLifeOrganized > Subject: [MLO] Re: Can't order groups by imporance/urgency > computed score? > > > > I believe the project groups are sorted alphabetically by > default, and it's within each group, that sorting by computed > score occurs. > > Can't help with the [*] - must be some filter you have set. > > On Aug 29, 10:27 am, RichardCollings <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hmmm - may have spoken too soon. But its very odd > > > > If I choose: > > * Action filter: All > > * Group by: Project > > * Sort by: Computed score (decending) << this wasn't set > when I made > > my previous post > > * Context: �...@weekend Projects > > > > I get my projects as group headings with (some of [*]) their tasks > > underneath but I then also get the projects at the end of > the list as > > tasks under a group heading of Project: (none). Is this intended > > behavior - can anybody explain? Note: not complaining, > just puzzled. > > > > The fact that the Projects appear as Tasks means that I can > access the > > important/context slider - which is good. > > > > But as I change these sliders, the order of both the Group headings > > and the Project tasks (under Project: (none)) change but the orders > > are not the same. > > > > The list of project tasks as the end appear to be order of their > > computed scores; but the project groups appear in a different order > > > > ie > > > > Project A: > > - Task A1 > > > > Project B > > - Task B1 > > > > Project C > > - Task C1 > > - Task C2 > > > > Project: (none) > > - Project A > > - Project C > > - Project B > > > > The order looking at the computed scores of the projects > should be A, > > C, B - so the last list is correct. Why is the order of the first > > items different? (And its not that Task B1 has a higher score than > > Task C1 - it doesn't). What is determining the order of the first > > three items. > > > > [*] The other puzzling thing about this view is that not all the > > tasks under the projects are appearing. In the case of Project A > > and Project B there are more tasks that are not appearing; in the > > case of Project C all tasks are appearing. I have not ticked > > 'Complete subtasks in order' and I do not have any dependencies set. > > > > On Aug 29, 3:50 pm, Richard C <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Very disappointed to find that if I choose to group tasks by > > > 'Project' that MLO does not display the Projects in order > of their > > > computed score and that you can't access the scoring > sliders in the > > > ToDo view > > > > > I was hoping to use this feature to order up coming projects into > > > priority order. > > > > > Is it possible to get MLO to show you a high level > overview of a set > > > of projects and to then put them int priority order? > How do other > > > people do this? > > > > > I feel another feature request coming on. > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
