Ah - I had forgotten that. That would deal with the second of my points. Thanks Interestingly the Help is silent on Task Dependencies for both the Active and Available filters. I don't use these very much but I presume they are also considered in determining what appears in the Active filter (ie: a task with a dependency on one more other tasks only appears if those tasks are marked as completed). The question then is whether dependencies are ignored in the Available filter. The other thing that perhaps could made clearer in the Help is that the Start Date filter behaviour is actually different to that of the other filters in that setting this to the future actually brings new tasks into the ToDo view. My understanding is that all other other filter options (eg Context, Advanced, etc) can simply restrict what is already in the view.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lisa Stroyan Sent: 17 October 2009 3:10 p To: [email protected] Subject: [MLO] Re: Missing action filter: like Active but includes future dated items? At 06:59 AM 10/17/2009, you wrote: Ah ha! So if I set the To: box for Start Date to Today+30, then I will also see tasks that are due to start in the next 30 days. That's useful. But presumably not: * tasks which are dependent on another task which has yet to be completed; nor * tasks which are not the first sub-task in a 'Complete subtasks in order' list If you use "Available" instead of "Active", you should see those as well. Lisa _____ Lisa Stroyan, [email protected] www.empathic-parenting.com <http://www.empathic-parenting.com/> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
