Going to try to keep it short for a change... :-) > It sounds to me a though you are suffering some sort of post-traumatic > stress as a result of having had a hard time with outlook's auto- > archive.
No, I usually disabled it in Outlook. I just noticed that MLO seemed to borrow the paradigm, but then added options which make "autoarchive" a misnomer since the feature can be configured to copy or delete items instead of just moving them. > Many of your suggestions seem to me to be nothing more than > trying to stamp out the words "auto-archive." I think this would be a > shame, as they are widely used words that are understood by many > people. Changing to a somewhat fuzzier phrase about cleaning up > completed tasks does not sound helpful to me. I admit I'm nitpicking about the name, but the name does not accurately represent all of the feature's options. Imagine going into a restaurant where all the sandwiches are called turkey sandwiches regardless of what's on them. You order a vegetarian sandwich and your friend orders a hamburger. The waiter reads back your order: "That would be one vegetarian turkey sandwich and one ground beef turkey sandwich, correct?" The name "turkey sandwich" in this case is confusing and misleading, just as the term "*archive" is misleading when used to describe the action of copying or deleting. Variations of the phrase "clean up completed tasks" are used extensively in the autoarchive settings dialog. I don't think changing the feature name to more accurately reflect the capabilities of the feature would cause any confusion in this case. I do understand that none of the changes I've proposed on behalf of confused new users everywhere are likely to be implemented in MLO anytime soon, if at all, but maybe these discussions will help other confused newbies. > I don't think that your option 2 works. You mention confusion any time > you need to unhide completed, but it's not just that. As the database > grows to hold all the completed tasks it will get heavy and eventually > slow your system down. Clicking the "clean up completed tasks" button would perform the same action that autoarchive currently performs. The only difference is that people who would otherwise have autoarchive prompt before running could now do it on-demand instead of having to wonder whether autoarchive will do the right thing. > My auto-archive usage is that daily, I move all completed tasks to an > archive file. Sometimes I need to research something from the archive > so it's nice to have it. This works fine for me and I have no > problems and nothing is mystifying. The only issue is that I have to > mark recurring tasks that have subtasks a do-not-archive, as you > mentioned. I would like to see a default setting for this. > -Dwight Thanks for sharing your archive settings; I'm glad I asked before trying autoarchive. I had hoped autoarchive would auto-skip recurring tasks but would have half expected yet another checkbox for that. (NO! Please do not take that remark as a feature request! :-P) I wouldn't expect everyone to consider that potential pitfall up front. Did you have to figure out the hard way that you have to mark recurring tasks as do-not-archive? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
