UPDATE:
I have discovered a serious problem with the View that I built as described 
above.  Which is that it is only showing Actions that are part of Projects. 
This means that Actions that have not (yet) been allocated a Project do not 
appear. And likewise when you tick the last Action off a project, the 
project disappears from view. Drat!! Back to square one...   >:^(





On Wednesday, December 3, 2014 1:23:37 AM UTC, John Smith wrote:
>
> Andrie
>
> Thank you - yes that's helpful.
>
>
> Meanwhile can you help me with this problem.
>
> I am trying to create a list of Next Actions - one per Project, but also 
> sorted not each Action's own Importance, but sorted by the Importance of 
> the *Project* to which each action belongs.
> And also to be able to see and edit the Importance of the Project to which 
> each Action belongs.
>
> Background: It seems to me that it is the Importance (and Urgency) of the 
> Project itself that is the most helpful think to keep an eye one. Whereas 
> if you sorted by the Importance of an Action then that would disappear as 
> soon as the Action is completed.
>
> I have experimented *at some length* with "Next Actions by Project". And 
> I have tried to use the filter setting:
> Filter ==> General ==> Show Actions: Next Actions
> However although this does create views that only show one Next Action 
> project, and although the Projects are can be put into order of 
> Project-level importance, you can not SEE (nor edit) the level of 
> Importance on that screen. So that is useless to me(!) 
>
> I have eventually concluded (after more time than is healthy!) that, very 
> counter-intuitively, that "Next Actions by Project" is NOT the way to go.
>
> The only thing that seems to work is to tick "Complete Subtasks in Order" 
> on every single project [slightly irritating] and then create a View with:
> Filter ==> General ==> Show Actions: Active
> Filter ==> General ==> Show Hierarchy: Yes
> Filter ==> Add Avanced ==> [un-ticked]
> Filter ==> Group & Sort ==> Group by ==> (none)
> Filter ==> Group & Sort ==> Sort... ==> Sort tasks by ==> Importance, 
> Descending
>
> This has the added benefit that I can quickly see what other Actions are 
> queuing up for a Project by unticking (Complete subtasks in order) field 
> (using the hotkey Alt/P). And if I wish to change the Next Action for 
> another one, I can of course then very easily scroll down and move the one 
> of the other actions up into the Next Action position (e.g. by using arrow 
> keys and Shift/Alt/UpArrow etc). And do all this without my hands leaving 
> the keyboard.
>
> One problem:
> For larger projects, using "Complete Subtasks in Order" becomes a problem 
> because the whole of the rest of the tree below a project is reduced to a 
> single next task! And I still suspect that Next Action would be better, 
> it's just that I can not for the life of me work out how to use it in a way 
> that works as I need!
>
> J
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/c26d3a75-3adf-4826-8f7e-0fa771ad3c2c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to