Is there any progress on this? Any plans to implement it? This is for me 
currently the biggest issue with MLO and I would very much support the 

On Friday, 26 November 2010 13:19:48 UTC+1, chuckdevee wrote:
> This would be really useful for me. I have quite a few problems with 
> the ordering in the ToDo views but get around most of these by being 
> sparing about which tasks I enter a Due Date for. 
> Most of the tasks I have, have some date which I'd LIKE to do them by, 
> but if I enter this as the due date, as I used to, my task outline 
> becomes very time-consuming as I am forever re-adjusting these due 
> dates. 
> Now, I only really use a due date if a task HAS to be done by that 
> date - otherwise, it goes in without any date and the Urgency/ 
> Importance criteria determines its order in the ToDo list.   I'll use 
> a Start Date if I don't want to think about starting the task until a 
> specific date. 
> So most of the tasks I have do not have Due dates, some have a Start 
> Date and no Due date, some have Due dates but no Start date, and the 
> rest have both Start dates and Due dates. 
> So here's my problem, in order for a task to recur, it needs to have a 
> start date and due date. 
> And the recurrence time period is set with reference to the Due 
> date. 
> It would be helpful for me to allow tasks without any dates to recur 
> without any dates. 
> It would also be helpful to allow tasks with only a start date to 
> recur with reference to the Start date and leave these tasks without 
> any Due date. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit

Reply via email to