Well, that's the point though. UserVoice is supposed to be maintained. That's not the fault of the users of MLO who used it. They went there thinking they were posting features in a system that was going to be maintained. The least Andrey could do is to close it down if he's not going to use it instead of having it sit there only to confuse people. To me, using it is smarter because you have people post features and then the he could easily see which features poeple wanted most. That doesn't mean they would or could be implemented. OneNote is using UserVoice and it seems to work wonderfully for them.
Joel On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 9:07:22 AM UTC-5, John . Smith wrote: > > The problem with uservoice is that it has been there too long and the > requests are out-of-date. This is disheartening for new users whose votes > simply disappear into a sea of out-of-date votes. And presumably most of > the requests still there are for things which MLO has decided not to go > ahead with, but they are at the top of the voting rankings. Also not > encouraging! > > Moreover, from what I could see, if the user is voting on completely > different software as well their 10 votes get used up by any votes for the > other software, which seems bonkers. > > I suggest all old votes on uservoice are archived off and that MLO starts > again there from fresh, with a new account if necessary. Or a use a > different voting site completely. > > Either way a decision is needed! And whatever the result is should be > reflected at the top of this Google Group. > > J > > > > > On 1 January 2017 at 04:45, Ivo Treszka <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Neither am I. I agree that I'm better off without it, and I won't log in >> to my old account for MLO. If they really want our feedback they'll make a >> better choice available. >> >> On Monday, December 26, 2016 at 7:04:10 PM UTC+11, Mark Krieger wrote: >>> >>> I am never on Facebook. Sometimes I think the world would be better >>> without it. >>> Having an account I decided to post there anyways, but since we do have >>> https://mlo.uservoice.com - private <https://mlo.uservoice.com> where >>> people can actually *gasp* vote on features so it is clearly visible what >>> users want instead of trying to compile that manually from a list of >>> Facebook posts would make more sense to me. But then I am more into tech >>> and automation than being social. >>> Say...did MLO maybe forget that https://mlo.uservoice.com - private >>> <https://mlo.uservoice.com> exists? Sometimes it seems that way... >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mylifeorganized/8EKErYtGk8E/unsubscribe >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/7a546a6e-a656-428b-9a97-e516d1dab56c%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/7a546a6e-a656-428b-9a97-e516d1dab56c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/2bbf6d8f-779d-46a0-88cc-c1d712c80133%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
