I can understand the concern of longer delays in moderation.  My problem
with anti spam filters is simply because they are too much like anti-virus
filters.  TOO many false positives.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Werby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Eric Fitzgerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: Signal to Noise Ratio...


> "Eric Fitzgerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The amount of spam and other noise
> > on the list has been growing more and more every day.
>
> Agreed.  Same thing's happening with my own email accounts.
>
> > Second, perhaps setup some basic moderation, I'll help if
> > need be :)
>
> I think most people asking questions on the list would rather have some
spam
> slip through than have a thread of a few rapid fire posts take hours in
the
> future because of moderation delays.  Maybe implementation of a procmail
> spam filter like the extensive set of procmail recipes put together by
> http://www.spambouncer.org/ will cut down on the spam.  Just my 2 cents.
>
> --
> Steve Werby
> President, Befriend Internet Services LLC
> http://www.befriend.com/
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

Reply via email to