InnoDB definately provides more features that BDB, and is probably
going to be faster, Gemini isn't available yet. BDB might be more
complete/stable.
So I'd say Gemini is out of the picture unless you are looking longer
term. I'd do some testing with both we found some bugs in the 3.23.37
distribution with regard to BDB, Monty sais they are fix in .38
Kevin McBrearty wrote:
>
> I have re-read the appropriate manual sections several times, trying to
> decide what is the best option for my database table types. I am using
> 3.32.37 on
> Linux, and am torn between InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini table types. Transaction
> handling is very important for my application (commit, rollback, etc.).
>
> I am leaning toward InnoDB at this point but was wondering if anyone could
> offer any information, other than what is in the manual, regarding the pros
> and cons of these table types.
>
> TIA
>
> Kevin McBrearty
> ATG Automation Technologies Group Ltd.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Before posting, please check:
> http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
> http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
>
> To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
