Am 15.04.2014 13:53, schrieb Johan De Meersman:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dimitre Radoulov" <cichomit...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, 15 April, 2014 12:17:54 PM
>>
>> for major release upgrades - 5.x to 6.x - we'll use a different hosts.
> 
> I would like to point out that where MySQL is concerned, the minor versions 
> are a major upgrade - 5.0->5.1, 5.1->5.5 and 5.5->5.6 are all MAJOR changes, 
> and you would do well to go through the release notes for each version.

he is talking about a long outstanding update of *CENTOS*
from 5.5 to 5.10 which does not anything to the mysql package
_______________________________________

Am 15.04.2014 13:33, schrieb Radoulov, Dimitre:> On 15/04/2014 12:18, Reindl 
Harald wrote:
>  Am 15.04.2014 12:05, schrieb Radoulov, Dimitre:
> [...]
>>> o ABI breakages, that's why you use RHEL or a clone at all
>>> Thank you! So I suppose we need to, or actually we *must*, upgrade the 
>>> binaries only in case of a release upgrade
>>> (RHEL 5 to 6, for example),
>>> i.e. when a different binary distribution exsists: 
>>> MySQL-5.6.17-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm to MySQL-5.6.17-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
>> el5 = RHEL5
>> el6 = RHEL6
>>
>> may i suggest to hire someone managing your systems
> [...]
>
> It seems that I gave a wrong impression, but we actually have a big
> team of sys admins :)

so what are they doing then all day long since you still run 5.5
released 4 years ago followed by 5 minor-updates bringing
critical security fixes?

5.5, also termed Update 5, 30 March 2010 (kernel 2.6.18-194)[17]
5.6, also termed Update 6, 13 January 2011 (kernel 2.6.18-238)[17]
5.7, also termed Update 7, 21 July 2011 (kernel 2.6.18-274)[17]
5.8, also termed Update 8, 20 February 2012 (kernel 2.6.18-308)[17]
5.9, also termed Update 9, 7 January 2013 (kernel 2.6.18-348)[17]
5.10, also termed Update 10, 1 October 2013 (kernel 2.6.18-371)[17]

> And we, DBAs, are managing the databases,
> thus my initial question ...

and you are stating that you don't use the distribution packages
of MySQL so it is not affected at all from a dist-upgrade?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to