My thanks to everything that helped!
Paul
Heikki Tuuri wrote:
Hi!
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Gallier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: InnoDB slow?
--------------060404050304080006000506 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I've not a clue - digging around somewhere on the Internet. I didn't see the info in the manual regarding fsync being used as default for Linux, but now I also notice that my manual says version 4.0.5.... <off to grab current manual>
Mikhail Entaltsev wrote:
Paul,
Where did you find information about 'littlesync' and 'nosync'?
In InnoDB manual I found only
'nosync' and 'littlesync' are undocumented features :). They were documented 2 years ago, but I removed the documentation because I did not want to maintain these features.
Then InnoDB uses fsync() to flush both the data and log files. If O_DSYNC is**************
This is only relevant on Unix. The default value for this is fdatasync.
specified, InnoDB uses O_SYNC to open and flush the log files, but uses
fsync() to flush the data files. If O_DIRECT is specified (available on some
Linux versions starting from MySQL-4.0.14), InnoDB uses O_DIRECT to open the
data files, and uses fsync() to flush both the data and log files. Note that
InnoDB does not use fdatasync() or O_DSYNC because there have been problems
with them on many Unix flavors.
innodb_flush_method:**************
Mikhail.
----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Gallier
To: Mikhail Entaltsev ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: InnoDB slow?
Thanks for the info.
I'm running MySQL 4.0.14 under Redhat 8.0 / Linux 2.4.20.
Here are the timings I ended up with from playing with
using nosync or o_dsync?innodb_flush_method=fdatasync (default) 10 minutes 37 seconds innodb_flush_method=littlesync 10 minutes 22 seconds innodb_flush_method=O_DSYNC 5 minutes 18 seconds innodb_flush_method=nosync 3 minutes 12 seconds MyISAM tables instead of InnoDB 2 minutes 34 seconds
Now of course, the question is what potential harm am I looking at by
'nosync' is dangerous. If there is a power outage, or the OS crashes, there is a great chance that your tablespace will be corrupted. MyISAM always runs in the 'nosync' mode, that is, it never calls fsync() to flush the files to disk.
InnoDB's nosync is useful in testing if some OS/computer is extremely slow in fsync(). But it should not be used in a production system.
O_DSYNC is safe, assuming there are no bugs in Linux/drivers/hardware. Since it is not very much used, the risk of bugs is bigger than for the default value fdatasync.
I would rather tweak
innodb_buffer_pool_size innodb_log_file_size innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit
to improve performance.
Note that InnoDB really maps
fdatasync() -> fsync() O_DSYNC -> O_SYNC
This is because in 2001 there was some evidence that fdatasync() caused file corruption both in Linux and Solaris.
Mikhail Entaltsev wrote:
Paul,
if your MySQL server is runnign under Linux then try to play with "innodb_flush_method" variable. I've changed it to O_DSYNC and InnoDB became ~ 9 times faster (Suse 8.2 Linux 2.4.20-4GB i386). Also check that you didn't allocate too much memory (OS shouldn't swap).
Best regards,
Mikhail.
Best regards,
Heikki Tuuri Innobase Oy http://www.innodb.com Foreign keys, transactions, and row level locking for MySQL InnoDB Hot Backup - a hot backup tool for MySQL