Bob Terrell wrote:
> So there you go. Give it a shot and see if it runs any faster. If you need the time,
> replace that first test in the WHERE clause with the one mentioned above. If this is
> run often (or if it just takes a _really_ long time), put an index on the date
> field, if one isn't there already. Your query as it stands has to read the entire
> table just for the date field.
Ah, now it striked me, that I should add
to this sum of WIKI articles instantiated in
"2" OR "5". Will do it with a second query or
use one of the functions written by my comrade
emes, I will have to look into the code to
check if I have to write my own.
Thanks again!
--
Seks, seksić, seksolatki... news:pl.soc.seks.moderowana
http://hyperreal.info { iWanToDie } WiNoNa ) (
http://szatanowskie-ladacznice.0-700.pl foReVeR( * )
Poznaj jej zwiewne kształty... http://www.opera.com 007
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
