> On Friday 21 January 2005 09:35 pm, David Shay wrote: > > On the uPNP front, would patches/additions be accepted to MythTV to build a > > uPNP server into the backend? Would it be better as another module? Would > > it be better to extend the functionality of mfd to include uPNP (both audio > > and video)? > > Might be best as part of mfd, but could also work as part of the backend - the > backend's in use more at the moment, at least. But, yeah, of course patches > would be accepted. =) > > Isaac
Since it really isn't similar to the mfd protocols at all, I was thinking it might be better in mythbackend. The only issue I see with that is that the uPNP AV server would need to catalog and serve up not just MythTV video, but also MythMusic and MythVideo ultimately. Would it be a problem to integrate this into mythbackend, assuming you do appropriate checks for installation before serving up essentially the contents of musicmetadata and videometadata? _______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
