-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Isaac Richards wrote: > On Monday 21 March 2005 08:23 pm, andrew burke wrote: > >>Look, it's common courtesy to bring up issues I have before I go and just >>fork the code. Forking a project can often cause lots of bad blood and >>problems. I do appreciate what all the devs have put together, I just >>think that things can be handled a bit differently to improve the end-user >>experience. I never said what the developers have done isn't worthwhile, >>but I do take issue with the way the project is being managed. I offered >>to help improve that situation numerous times, and the devs seem to have >>decided it isn't help they're interested in, and that's their choice. But >>personally, I know I would be upset if someone forked a project I started >>without at least raising the issues they had for doing so. > > > You have _not_ offered to help improve the situation. You've offered to help > move to subversion. That's not the same thing. > > Are you now changing your offer?
What Andrew is proposing would work just fine on CVS as well as subversion. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFCP4AY91+pr0EM9zgRAgaGAJ0Zs4G5nQz2Psh/M3tNnI2RaIwcGwCdEZYh 4yyM7UjPOlKJYtDGy7Uw+Pw= =pE3l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
