On Wednesday 02 November 2005 11:54 am, Devan Lippman wrote: > On 11/1/05, Kevin Kuphal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh, I agree. There is certain amount of gain in going from frontend to > > db. The question remains, is that gain worth the increased complexity > > in having multiple frontend platforms having to rewrite code to perform > > the same task (perhaps badly) as well as the configuration necessary to > > support it. How many times have we seen users hit by trying to > > understand configuring MySQL for access by remote frontends? To me it > > is the same arguments people use when evaluating proxy servers for web > > access. And yet, it is quite comman and accepted to use them because > > the gains outweigh any penalty incurred by the extra step. > > Speaking of this I was thinking about how zero-config was implemented in > mfd and wondering if there would be value to adding this to myth before mfd > is ready (of course I have no idea how close/far it is to being at a state > which could replace mythmusic, I say it could today). Putting zero-config > in there could be used to eliminate the step of setting the remote database > from the frontend completely.
That's the plan for the new db server app. Isaac
_______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
