While that's true, that all of the eye diagrams showed were ok, the ones with the on-chip nvidia were shown at 141mhz, because they were not compliant at 162mhz. This of course only matters at very high resolutions.
-Nate On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:03:53 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:02:34AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > After reading the article re. DVI compliance... > > > > So it looks like ATI cards are working better than NVidia for DVI. I am > > looking > > to by a TV that takes DVI and I am concerned about the compliance of Nvidia > > cards. Are the ATI cards supported at all? I have always used Nvidia with > > no > > problems. > > > > Thoughts? Experiences? > > I read the article and I think there's a bit of scaremongering going on. > > Did you see the eye diagrams? They are all perfect, though the article > says some of them are nearly out of specification. > > The specification will ensure that you still get a workable picture over > an X metre long cable; if you keep it short, it won't matter if you > card IS out of spec. > > The NVIDIA cards with the off-board SIL164 transmitter chip seemed to do > better than the ones using the built-in transmitter in the GeforceFX > (especially obvious on the card with one of each, the MSI NX6800 > Ultra), so if you are concerned, look for a card with that chip. > I expect it'll only be on the more expensive cards though. > > Hamish > -- > Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > _______________________________________________ > mythtv-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users > > >
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
