Bad letter. The first statement in it vindicates the author of the article:
"In truth, there may be a few people out there who are using MythTV for ill ends," No one who reads this letter is going to give a flying fig about anything that comes after that statement, let alone the editor of the NYT, who likely won't even read past it. The problem here is that without the negative connotations that villify us, this article would not be a story, at least not to the NYT. Dirt sells newspapers, happy thoughts do not. Marvin On 31 Jan 2005 at 21:41, Chris Petersen wrote: > There has been a lot of uproar about the recent NYT article that comes > very close to accusing MythTV users of being TV pirates. At the request > of a few people on #mythtv-users, I've posted both a letter and a > petition, which will be sent to the Times in a week or two (depending on > how many people sign). You can find them at: > > http://forevermore.net/mythtv/nyt/ > > Please don't overload my poor DSL line. :) > > -Chris > >
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
