On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 07:31:54 -0500, Brian J. Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah. OSD. On-screen-display. Perhaps you thought that by OSD I only > meant the few overlays that pop-up over playing video. No. By OSD I > mean the whole On-screen-display.
So rather than follow established terminology you invent your own and expect everyone else to follow along? Pretty much everyone understand that an OSD refers to UI that's overlayed on the video rather than generic GUIs, except those that need to justify the fact that they've been talking out their ass. > Exactly. I never said that the OSD needed to know about vsync. I said > video playback needed to know about vsync. The OSD still needs to be > able to display in a manner that is compatible with the video card's > TV-Out mode, and for the G400, the only true replication of video > broadcast display I have seen available is with DirectFB, which means > that if you want to use DirectFB's CRTC2 TV-out for video display you > also have to use that for the OSD display since using the > X11/framebuffer TV-out (i.e. using the matroxfb_maven kernel module and > matroxset) is mutually exclusive with using DirectFB. You can get quality thats indistinguishable from broadcast using nVidia cards. > > Please, get a clue before spouting off extremely inaccurate comments. > > No Isaac, my comments are not "extremely inaccurate". You've made several statements about what is and is not possible that were flat out wrong. You tried to portray yourself as an expert when it's pretty clear that you have even done the basic homework. You've made claims about MythTV without even having a CLUE about how it's implemented. So yeah I think Isaac was pretty much spot on.
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
