Thus spake Andy Long:
> I disagree with your assessment of Dvorak's article.  I sometimes
> disagree with him, but I really don't think he paints MythTV in a
> negative light whatsoever.  This is posted for the purposes of
> academic discussion about the article and its implications.
> 
> ------BEGIN ARTICLE-------
<snip>
> ------END ARTICLE-------

I would have to agree - I thought that article painted MythTV in quite a
positive light, and actually hit the real reason why projects like
MythTV are such a big hit - we as consumers want *choice*, not to be
told when/where/how we can watch content we've paid for.  He touched on
the DVD issue, but made clear that such things are not part of MythTV
proper by explaining the plugin architecture.  Overall, I think this is
one of the better articles about MythTV that I've seen.

-- 
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Obviously I was either onto something, or on something. -- Larry Wall
on the creation of Perl

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

Reply via email to