I agree. I liked the article. Made me feel all warm inside :P
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 01:02:58 -0600, Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thus spake Andy Long: > > I disagree with your assessment of Dvorak's article. I sometimes > > disagree with him, but I really don't think he paints MythTV in a > > negative light whatsoever. This is posted for the purposes of > > academic discussion about the article and its implications. > > > > ------BEGIN ARTICLE------- > <snip> > > ------END ARTICLE------- > > I would have to agree - I thought that article painted MythTV in quite a > positive light, and actually hit the real reason why projects like > MythTV are such a big hit - we as consumers want *choice*, not to be > told when/where/how we can watch content we've paid for. He touched on > the DVD issue, but made clear that such things are not part of MythTV > proper by explaining the plugin architecture. Overall, I think this is > one of the better articles about MythTV that I've seen. > > -- > Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Obviously I was either onto something, or on something. -- Larry Wall > on the creation of Perl > > > _______________________________________________ > mythtv-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users > > > > -- GMAIL is 'da bomb baby....YEAH I have GMail invites, if you want one, email me direct.
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
