On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:48:28 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 09:35:34PM +0000, Dan Robinson wrote: > > cards (cx88 nova-t's): > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] .tzap]# /usr/src/dvb-apps/util/szap/tzap "BBC ONE" > > using '/dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0' and '/dev/dvb/adapter0/demux0' > > status 01 | signal 0029 | snr c000 | ber 00003fff | unc 00000100 | > > status 1f | signal 002a | snr ff3a | ber 000000c5 | unc 00000024 | > > FE_HAS_LOCK > > status 1f | signal 002a | snr ffff | ber 00000000 | unc 000000c6 | > > FE_HAS_LOCK > > status 1f | signal 002a | snr ff91 | ber 0000006e | unc 000000c3 | > > FE_HAS_LOCK > > status 1f | signal 002a | snr ffff | ber 00000000 | unc 000000b3 | > > FE_HAS_LOCK > > status 1f | signal 002a | snr ffe2 | ber 0000001d | unc 000000a5 | > > FE_HAS_LOCK > > status 1f | signal 002a | snr ffff | ber 00000000 | unc 00000098 | > > FE_HAS_LOCK > > Check the uncorrected errors. Whenever it is non-zero, you have > corruption in your data stream. This can't be caused by the 0.17 > upgrade. > > Strange that your BER is so low and yet uncorrected errors so high. What > frontend is on your cards? mt352? >
Thanks Hamish for so many good new information about the DVB stuff ;) Could you just explain more about it? Which values are important in the output of (tsc)zap? I've been always looking at the FE_HAS_LOCK string only. Then I've ctrl-C tzap if the first line didn't have a lock but the following ones. Is this ok? Adam
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
