Standing is such a bugaboo, and what I've been most worried since this campaign started. Was the brief prepared for questions of standing? The article left unsaid anything about the oral argument for standing.
IANAL, but I'm interested in law, and at one point seriously considered law school. -Jonathan On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:22:53 -0800, Wendy Seltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 8:58 PM -0500 2/22/05, Mark wrote: > >Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > >>Some good news, of some relevance to MythTV users: > >> > >>http://finance.myway.com/ht/nw/bus/20050222/hlm_bus-n22530838.html > >> > >> > >Wow! Is this what I think it is? the first step to striking down > >the broadcast flag? > > So long as the judges find we have standing as consumer advocacy > groups and library associations to challenge the flag rule, yes. > From the reports I've heard, they seemed skeptical of FCC's arguments. > > --Wendy > -- > -- > Wendy Seltzer -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Electronic Frontier Foundation > Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School > http://wendy.seltzer.org/mythtv/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mythtv-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users > > >
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
