On 8/26/05, Mark J. Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On August 26, 2005 06:18 am, Louie Ilievski wrote: > > This sounds like a really good idea to me. My big question: > > If I have an interlaced signal recorded, why would I want to de-interlace to > send it my TV? Wouldn't an interlaced signal be closer to the original?? > > Mark
You're quite right, you don't want to de-interlace unless you're displaying on a non-interlaced display. The method I proposed (and use) sends the original (un-scaled, un-filtered, interlaced) signal straight back to the TV. That's the primary reason the result looks so good. Steve _______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
