Robert Denier wrote:
I tend to more or less agree that changing channels super fast is not
too important.  Small dish receivers haven't ever done this fast.  Of
course adding the myth layer slows things down a little, but for quite
practical reasons and its no big deal.

Now if one wanted a trivial way to flip channels fast, at least in
principle, you could use inactive capture cards to lock on and start a
stream on the next channel while your still on the current channel.
Then you also need to have the decompression sequence started as well,
but in principle you could double your flipping channels rate.

Is it worth the trouble?  I doubt it...

-Robert Denier

On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 21:33 -0700, Joe Votour wrote:
  
I agree, with one caveat.

I still use the LiveTV feature, although not as much
as I used to (because even though I'm on the west
coast, most of my channels are east coast feeds, which
necessitates recording everything).

Even though I still use LiveTV, I would never, ever
"channel surf".  What's the point, when you have full
program information available with only a button
press?  If I'm watching LiveTV (because, perhaps I've
watched all of my recordings), when I want to find
something to watch, I'll scroll through the program
guide.  It's much more effective than scrolling
through every channel.

Even with a real TV, channel surfing is a pointless
waste of time.  While you're busy going through your
50+ channels looking for something to watch, you might
be missing something you'd actually enjoy.

-- Joe

--- Andrew McNabb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

    
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:08:55PM -0400, Sam Krupa
wrote:
      
What is the fix for the channel changing problem!

        
Everyone knows that changing channels is slow, but
most of us don't
care.  I can't remember the last time I turned on
the TV to watch Live
TV.  I just record all of the shows I like.  MythTV
was designed and
optimized for time-shifting, and I don't think there
are very many
people that would want to change that design just to
make changing
channels faster.  That's my opinion, anyway.

-- 
Andrew McNabb
http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/
PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55  8012 AB4D
6098 8826 6868
      
_______________________________________________
        
mythtv-users mailing list
[email protected]

      
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
    

		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Music Unlimited 
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

    

  

_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
Good thinking!

This would be a great default functionality for an idle second tuner.  (IE: when a PVR-500 is not recording anything, it can help improve your performance.)  But then the idle tuner has to answer the question: "Do I tune to current channel plus one or current channel minus one?"  I guess the natural answer is "Assume the user is going to continue surfing in the same direction."  But it won't help with the first channel change, or at least I guess there is a 50/50 chance of it being tuned to the right 'next' channel.

Then you also have then problem:
A PVR-500 owner always wants the second tuner to be the default for single recordings.  Why?  Because only the first tuner can be used for listening to the FM radio.  If you try to listen to the radio while the first tuner is recording...
http://www.ivtvdriver.org/pipermail/ivtv-users/2005-October/000048.html
-- 


	Thank you for your time,
	--==<< R i c h a r d   B r o n o s k y >>==--

Nearly all viruses and spyware are designed to use Microsoft internet products.  Protect yourself by avoiding Internet Explorer & Outlook/Outlook Express.
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

Reply via email to