Hi Thomas,

I like the design you proposed, and I agree it is a good idea to list other 
data types (STRING, INT, DOUBLE etc).

Cheers,

Tomas



The proposed
On Nov 5, 2014, at 23:55, TFRD (Thomas Franck Dyrlund) 
<t...@steno.dk<mailto:t...@steno.dk>> wrote:

Hi Tomas

I have modified the SQL export parameter prompt to include all the information 
available under the data file elements:
<image001.png>

Do you have any comments to the above before I start modifying 
SQLExportTask.java to accommodate the above changes? I will implement the 
changes so that only if a data file element is chosen then all sample files are 
exported. In that way the current implementation shouldn’t be broken. This is 
also the reason why the isotope and MS/MS pattern are grouped under the 
identity element.

And I guess the reason why (BLOB) is listed is to show the data format for that 
data type. Any reason why this is not shown in the export value instead and 
then also implemented for all the other data types to show if it is a STRING, 
INT … ?

Best,

Thomas

From: Tomas Pluskal [mailto:plus...@oist.jp]
Sent: 1. november 2014 09:12
To: Developer discussion
Subject: Re: [Mzmine-devel] Peak list export

Hi Thomas,

We are using the SQL export function in our lab, so I would prefer if the 
current functionality is not broken. However, feel free to extend the 
functionality - e.g. by adding an option to export all peaks in the row.

Best regards,

Tomas


On Oct 31, 2014, at 19:12, TFRD (Thomas Franck Dyrlund) 
<t...@steno.dk<mailto:t...@steno.dk>> wrote:


I have been looking into the sql export function of MZmine and would like to 
discuss the implementation – it seems that the sql export function is different 
than the csv export.

The issue is that when exporting data from an aligned peak list, the values in 
mz, rt, peak height and peak area are average values based on all samples. Is 
there a reason for this average value implementation and do you know if anyone 
uses it?

In my opinion – and based on what I need for my data processing – then a better 
implementation would be to export all values for each individual sample in the 
peak list.

Best regards,

Thomas
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mzmine-devel mailing list
Mzmine-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Mzmine-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mzmine-devel

===============================================
Tomas Pluskal
G0 Cell Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan
WWW: https://groups.oist.jp/g0
TEL: +81-98-966-8684
Fax: +81-98-966-2890

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mzmine-devel mailing list
Mzmine-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Mzmine-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mzmine-devel

===============================================
Tomas Pluskal
G0 Cell Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan
WWW: https://groups.oist.jp/g0
TEL: +81-98-966-8684
Fax: +81-98-966-2890

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mzmine-devel mailing list
Mzmine-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mzmine-devel

Reply via email to